Untimely deployment of thrust reverser would be a hazard, which could be assigned an identifier based on ATA code This page was last edited on 24 April , at Using qualitative assessment, aircraft functions and subsequently aircraft system functions are systematically analyzed for failure conditions, and each failure condition is assigned a hazard classification. Handbooks and manuals Engineering literature. The CCA consists of three separate types of analyses which are designed to uncover hazards not created by a specific subsystem component failure. Back to desktop version Back to mobile version.
|Date Added:||3 December 2012|
|File Size:||8.93 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
ARPA and ARP Training – Konatus
User name Password Remember me Log in. Each hazard is assigned a unique identifier that is tracked throughout the entire safety life cycle. The SSA summarizes the residual risks remaining in the system and should show all hazards meet the failure rates.
The first 30 pages of the document covers that process. This page was last edited on 24 Aprilat Articles Fault Tolerance for Digital Systems. Handbooks and manuals Engineering literature. Other methods include dependence diagram or reliability block diagram and Markov Analysis. Some of the methods covered: FHA results are coordinated with the system design 7461 as aircraft functions are allocated to aircraft systems.
The Zonal Safety Analysis ZSA looks at each compartment on the aircraft and looks for hazards that can affect every component in that compartment, such as loss of cooling air or a fluid line bursting. The methods outlined here identify a systematic means, but not the only means, to show compliance.
ARP – Wikipedia
The safety design requirements are captured and traced. In the case of the implementation of existing designs in a new derivation, alternate means such as service experience may be used to show compliance. Software is always included in this analysis as well as looking for manufacturing errors or “bad lot” components. One approach is to identify systems by their ATA system codes and the corresponding hazards by derivative identifiers.
Back to desktop version Back to mobile version. Retrieved from ” https: RAM Commander Version 8. When aircraft derivatives or system changes are certified, the processes described herein are usually applicable only to the new designs or to existing designs that are affected by the changes.
The Common Mode Analysis CMA looks at the redundant critical components to find failure modes which can cause all to fail at about the same time.
A Comparison of STPA and the ARP 4761 Safety Assessment Process 1
Views Read Edit View history. Fault trees may be performed for major hazards if warranted.
The Particular Risk Analysis PRA looks for external events which can create a hazard such as a birdstrike or engine turbine 461. ALD Solutions for the Railway. Subsystem failure rate budgets are assigned so that hazard probability limits can be met. The PSSA may contain qualitative FTA, which can be used to identify systems requiring redundancy so that catastrophic events do not result from a single failure or dual failure where one is latent.
The CCA consists of three separate types of analyses which are designed to uncover hazards not created by a specific subsystem component failure. A failure such as a bad resistor in all flight control computers would be addressed here. For example, the thrust reverser system could be identified by its ATA code The Functional Safety process is focused on identifying functional failure conditions leading to hazards.
This document also presents information on the safety analysis methods needed to conduct the safety assessment. This Recommended Practice defines a process for using common modeling techniques to assess the safety of a system being put together.